The history of car radio
began in the 1920's when attempts were made to use ordinary battery powered
domestic receivers in cars. Aerials were large frame types, or a zig zag
of wire between posts mounted on the car body. Horn speakers or headphones
provided the sound. With audio power in only milliwatts, no acoustic insulation
for engine and road noise, and unsuppressed ignition systems, it was not
practical to use the radio while the car was being driven.
The first serious attempts at car radio design was to have the receiver built into a shielded metal box and mounted on the running board or under the floor. With the limited signal pickup available from the unavoidably inefficient aerial, superhet designs caught on fairly early because of the high sensitivity required, although some multi stage TRF designs existed (e.g. Crosley "Roamio" 90). AGC was also essential for a practical car set, given the wide variations of signal strength encountered as the car is driven from one place to another. By now, cone speakers, and soon after, more conventional electrodynamic speakers were in use. While receiver design had adapted to using the vehicle's battery as the "A" supply for the valve heaters, "B" (or H.T.) batteries for the valve plates and screens were still required, as were "C" batteries for the grid bias. These being dry batteries were not rechargeable, and the problem was that the B batteries (typically three or four 45V batteries; 135 or 180V) were expensive, and could require replacement every few months depending on use.
Because of the wide voltage variation of a 1920's car electrical system, ordinary directly heated valves were too fragile to be powered from it whilst under charge. Depending on whether or not there was a voltage regulator fitted to the generator, and what the charge current was, the 6V electrical system could easily rise up to 9V. It took until the late 1930's before most cars were fitted with a voltage regulator.
Additionally, fragile battery valve filaments were not designed to withstand the vibration they would be exposed to in a car.
Indirectly heated valves.
A series of indirectly heated valves with 2.5V heaters were introduced in the late 1920's for use in AC powered domestic sets. Well known examples include the 24,27, and 35, and then later the 57, 58, 59, 2A5, etc. These were also sufficiently rugged to allow their heaters to be powered from a car electrical system, and could withstand the mechanical vibration. By connecting pairs of heaters in series (5V) they could be operated directly from the 6V car battery on the premise that there would be some voltage drop in the wiring, and the car was not being driven when the radio was in use. Some designs included a small dropping resistor for a nominal 6V operation. Alternatively, groups of three heaters could be connected in series, totalling 7.5V which would be more suitable for a battery on charge.
Having successfully powered the valve heaters from the car electrical system, a large part of the battery expense of very early experimental sets had been taken care of.
This "Auto Pilot" from 1929 is typical of the time. The cone speaker can be seen hanging at the rear window. A premonition of the disposable consumer society; "does not lessen the car's trade in value". At this point in time, car radios were not intended to be used whilst the car was being driven.
In the early 1930's, valves were especially
designed for car radio use; the first types including 36, 37, and
39. This is where the 6.3V standard came from, for this is the voltage
of a fully charged 6V lead acid battery at rest. Because of the indirectly
heated cathodes, these valves also became popular for AC powered radios,
making the 2.5V valves obsolete by the mid 1930's. The heaters were also
sufficiently rugged to accommodate the normal voltage variation in a car
Around 1931, a typical car radio would have its heaters fed from the car electrical system, but still rely on B batteries. To make a car radio really practical, the next challenge was to eliminate the B battery.
The problem of course is that being DC, the 6V available from the car battery cannot simply be put through a transformer to provide the requisite high voltage. One obvious way to perform the DC to DC conversion was to have a 6V electric motor driving a high voltage DC generator. Indeed, such a device known as a "Dynamotor", "motor-generator" "Genemotor", or "Magmotor", did enjoy a brief popularity in the early 1930's, to be revived again during the war for military applications.
However, the P.R. Mallory company came up with an alternative method which did use a transformer. A vibrating interrupter created the AC necessary for the transformer to operate from a DC supply. This design, refined and improved during the 1930's, was cheaper, more efficient, and quieter than the motor-generator approach. It became standard for car radios until the end of the valve era in the 1960's.
Converting DC to AC.
The use of a vibrator to create AC from DC was not new. It had been known since Victorian times, having being used with induction coils for laboratory experiments, early radio transmission, and ignition coils; the best known of these being used in the Model T Ford. In each of these cases, the vibrator contacts were attracted, and thus opened by the magnetic field of the transformer core itself.
Some crude attempts were actually made by experimenters to adapt Model T Ford coils to function as a B battery eliminator. 6V DC would be fed into the coil in the usual way, and then the high voltage output was half wave rectified by a diode connected triode. The loading of the output by the receiver would keep the voltage down to something acceptable, relying on the poor regulation of the Ford coil. The turns ratio is hardly optimum, and neither is the waveform produced. Nor is there any inherent RFI suppression.
This crude B battery eliminator has poor regulation and no RFI suppression.. The spark gap "G" is required to protect the secondary coil insulation should there be no load on the output. This example still requires a separate battery for the rectifier heaters.
The Elkonode is born.
What Mallory came up with was far more refined, being specifically designed for the purpose. A separate vibrating interrupter, called an "Elkonode", was connected in series with the primary winding of a step up transformer so that it could be fed with DC, and RFI filtering chokes and capacitors were included. For rectification, a Raytheon BR gaseous half wave rectifier was used. The whole thing was enclosed in a metal box, thus providing shielding, and simply fitted with a pair of terminals for the battery connection, and another set for the 135V or 180V output. It was quieter, and more efficient than a motor generator, as well as being about half the cost.
The device, branded as the "Mallory- Elkon B Eliminator" was announced in at the start of 1932. It was used either as a conventional stand alone eliminator to replace the B batteries of an existing set, or as by some manufacturers, built into the set itself.
1932 was the year of the so called "Auto B Eliminator" and thus began the popularisation of car radio. There were other manufacturers besides Mallory, using variations of the vibrating interrupter, and others were using motor generator techniques. However, Mallory's "Elkon" eliminator was the most promoted and most popular. With a rapid development of vibrator technology, the motor generator quickly became obsolete for car radio use.
The name "Elkonode" comes from the Elkon
Division of the Mallory company. Philip Rogers Mallory who founded the
company in 1916, initially supplying tungsten for light bulb manufacturers,
had taken over the Elkon company by the mid 1920's, and the Elkon Division
now made dry rectifiers and electrolytic capacitors for battery chargers
and eliminators. It is worth noting that Mallory was behind the development
of the dry electrolytic capacitor, a component which has been taken for
granted for many years. Mallory diversified into other electronic components
such as conventional capacitors and resistors, and also bought the Yaxley
switch company. Much later, Mallory developed the mercury and alkaline
battery; the latter being the company's best known product today under
the Duracell brand. Conveniently, their expertise with tungsten played
an important part of the Elkonode development, as this was just the kind
of hard wearing metal needed for its contacts.
Inside view of the Elkonode. The contacts and driving coil can be clearly seen. The gaseous type Raytheon BR rectifier used with the Elkononde.
How does the Elkonode work?
This simplified diagram illustrates the
Elkonode operation. The tungsten contacts are normally closed, so when
the 6V battery is connected current flows through the driving coil, the
contacts, and the transformer primary. As the driving coil is mounted adjacent
to the reed to which the contacts are mounted (see the above open view),
the magnetic attraction causes the contacts to open. This interrupts the
current flow. Now, with no current in the driving coil, and no magnetic
field, the contacts close again and the cycle repeats. Due to the inertia
of the reed this is not instantaneous, and in the case of the Elkonode
it happens about 85 times per second.
It can be seen therefore, the current flowing through the transformer primary is being interrupted at the same rate. This means that the magnetic flux in the transformer core is now changing, and transformer action can now occur. Basically, the transformer is being fed pulsating DC. While not actually alternating current as such, because the polarity of the supply is not reversing, the effect is similar.
At the secondary of the transformer is a much higher voltage, as determined by the turns ratio.
Any conventional rectifier can be used in the normal way, but for the Elkonode, a Raytheon type BR was used. This is a gaseous rectifier, relying on the internal gas to ionise and heat the cathode. It is thus quick heating and needs no heater supply. Because of the asymmetrical waveform, the use of a full wave rectifier will not be as beneficial as might be initially thought. It would be a couple of years before valve technology provided indirectly heated rectifier valves, such as the 1V and 84. Later, the year of 1935 saw gaseous rectifiers become popular again with the type 0Z4.
Normal capacitor choke filtering then provides a relatively pure DC for the radio receiver.
As shown, the circuit above is not actually practical as it does not include RFI suppression, nor anything to prevent the contacts arcing. Arcing will occur because when the contacts open, there is an uncontrolled collapse of the magnetic flux in the transformer. If the polarity of the current from the collapsing flux is opposite to that when the contacts make again, an undesirably high current will flow. There is also the high voltage back EMF which can be sufficient to ionise the air between the contacts.
The Elkonode circuit (1932).
The practical circuit of the actual eliminator includes the other necessary components. The Elkonode itself is a plug in unit like a valve to allow for easy service or replacement. Being enclosed in a metal container, it is also shielded against radiating RFI from the rapidly opening and closing contacts. Sparking at the contacts is eliminated by the 450R resistor and .5uF capacitor. It would appear the 450R functions by damping the decaying resonance of the transformer inductance when the contacts open, and is probably more related to reducing RFI than actual contact sparking. This scheme is also used in more modern full wave vibrator circuits. The .5uF slows the collapse of magnetic flux so that the back EMF is not high enough to ionise the air and thus arc across the contacts.
The .05uF would be purely for RFI suppression. Across the secondary of the transformer is connected another .05uF capacitor. In the modern vibrator power supply this known as the buffer capacitor and tunes the transformer to the frequency of the vibrator. However, when the Elkonode circuit was developed, such knowledge was in its infancy and it is not clear if this capacitor value was chosen on the basis of something that "appears to work", or if it was deliberately used to tune the transformer. Mallory notes suggest the former. Either way, it helps reduce the RFI.
Note that the rectifier valve has a link between two pins. This is to prevent the Elkonode operating if the rectifier valve is removed.
A conventional LC filter with two chokes and three 8uF electrolytic capacitors filters the B+ in the usual way. It is interesting to note the first choke is resonated at the Elkonode frequency with a .5uF capacitor to improve the filtering. Given the half wave rectifier, this is a worthwhile inclusion. Across the filtered output is a voltage divider which provides some initial load before the valves warm up, and also provides an intermediate voltage for receivers that require it (usually for detector or first audio stages).
This eliminator is designed to allow the use of sets where a "C" (grid bias) battery is used. The B- is not earthed in the eliminator, but there is a 12uF capacitor between B- and earth which provides the necessary AC bypassing. By means of a suitable resistor or voltage divider connected between terminals B- and G, the requisite negative voltage(s) can be obtained.
An interesting feature is that by plugging in different Elkonodes to the eliminator unit, different output characteristics can be obtained without changing the transformer. The different characteristics are determined by the number of turns and wire gauge of the driving coil winding. This feature actually shows up one of the limitations of the Elkonode which will be discussed later.
|Elkonode Type||Input Current (A) at 6V||Output at 180V (mA)||Output at 135V (mA)|
The Elkon B Eliminator may be used with a variety of receiving sets by selecting the appropriate Elkonode. Not shown are the 12V types G1 to G6, and 32V types F1 to F6.
This Audiola 23S7 is typical of design where the Elkonode, transformer, and rectifier are part of the set itself.
The Dual Reed Elkonode (1933-1934).
Cost is reduced and unit is more compact than the original.
The next stage of development saw the elimination of the rectifier valve from the 1932 model, making for an even more compact unit. It can be imagined that the rectifier is actually a switch, closing only when its anode is positive relative to the cathode. The switching action also occurs at the same frequency and time when the primary contacts close. So, why not add a second reed and set of contacts to the Elkonode to do just that? This was the beginning of the "Self-Rectifying" or "dual reed" Elkonode, and synchronous rectification for the 1933-1934 models. The use of rectifying contacts in a vibrator also is more efficient by eliminating the voltage drop that would otherwise occur across a valve rectifier.
Note that now there are two reeds and the
driving coil has been relocated so that its core can attract both at the
same time. This is unlike the later synchronous vibrator which has only
one reed that is fitted with extra contacts. It can be seen that when the
coil is energised, both reeds will be attracted towards the centre of the
unit, thus breaking both contacts.
The circuit above shows the circuit used with the dual reed Elkonode. The spark/RFI suppression components for the Elkonode are not shown as they are mounted internally. A relay is used to switch the 6V supply to the eliminator, simplifying the connection to the set. It means a shorter connection can be made to the battery, and the set's switch does not have to handle the eliminator current.
As before, the principles of operation are the same, but the rectifier valve has been replaced by the extra contacts. There is also a "phantom load resistor". If the Elkonode is run with no load, there is the risk of arcing at the rectifier contacts.
The phantom load resistor action is entirely automatic by virtue of the relay. As the relay is in series with the B+ supply to the receiver, it can be seen that the relay would not be energised when the set it first turned on and the valves are cold, for in this state they draw no current. The normally closed contacts connect the phantom load resistor, providing the necessary load for the Elkononde. Once the valves warm up and current is drawn, the relay coil pulls in the contacts, disconnecting the phantom load resistor.
|Elkonode Type||Output V||Output current with no voltage divider||Output current with 2mA voltage divider||Output power (W)||Current drain at 6.6V (A)||Phantom load relay pull in current (ma)|
Characteristics of the dual reed Elkonode. Not shown are types G10 to G14 for 12V, and F10 to F14 for 32V.
This Lafayette S17762 car radio is typical of the circuitry used with the dual reed Elkonode. The primary reed is on the left and the secondary, or rectifying, reed is on the right.
It should be mentioned that both the single reed and dual reed Elkonode circuits are input polarity conscious. This is because of the asymmetrical waveform produced. If the polarity is incorrect, the output will be less, and also arcing of the contacts is likely. This is because when the secondary voltage is at its greatest the rectifying contact is open (or the rectifier valve is not conducting) and thus the output is unloaded. In the case of the dual reed type, the output voltage will also be reversed in polarity.
Limitations of the Elkonode.
At this point we need to look at some problems with the Elkonode design. Firstly, the driving coil for the vibrating reed is in series with the transformer primary. Therefore it carries the entire current of the eliminator input.
Now, as to what that current is, it all depends on the B+ load current. The problem arises in that the amplitude of reed vibration is dependent on the B+ loading. In particular, the reed will not vibrate correctly if the secondary load is insufficient.
This erratic reed vibration on no load is the reason why the self rectifying Elkononde will suffer arcing at the rectifier contacts as mentioned previously. Because the primary and secondary reeds are independent, it can be seen that with erratic pull from the driving coil, what the secondary reed does is not necessarily going to be in synchronism with the primary reed. In otherwords, under no load conditions, the rectifier contacts might be out of sync with the primary contacts. As is well known, the subsequent synchronous vibrators use a common reed so this can no longer occur.
Another limitation is that with the Elkonode contacts normally closed, a rather high current flows in the primary circuit to start with, when the eliminator is first switched on. All that limits the current is the wiring resistance to the battery, and the winding resistances of the transformer primary and driving coil. All three of these must be as low as possible. When the contacts open, a rather large current is being switched therefore, during the first opening of the contacts until the vibrator starts.
Starting can also be unreliable if there is too much resistance in the battery lead. The problem occurs because with the high starting current of the vibrator and the cold valve heaters, the voltage applied to the vibrator can be too low. The problem then is the vibrator does not start, the contacts remain closed, and high current flows until the fuse blows. This is why a heavy gauge wire to the battery is often specified for this kind of eliminator.
Thirdly, although nothing to do with reliability, is the half wave operation. This sacrifices some efficiency because of DC flowing through the transformer windings and possibly saturating the core, and also current is flowing for only half of every cycle.
What became of the Elkonode?
One of Mallory's competitors was Utah, who made two very significant developments. One was full wave operation. Instead of simply applying pulsating DC to the transformer primary, full wave operation provided proper AC. It now becomes desirable to incorporate full wave rectification with its own advantages. Utah's full wave eliminator was announced in November 1932, and full wave vibrator circuits were quite common by mid 1933.
Basic shunt drive, full wave circuit. Buffer and filtering capacitors are not shown.
The other, perhaps more significant, development was the separate drive coil circuit, or "shunt drive". Here, a high resistance driving coil was connected across the switching contacts, rather than in series. As the transformer primary current no longer flowed through the coil, vibration was independent of loading to a considerably greater degree. As the driving coil was no longer passing the current of the whole inverter, it could be of much higher resistance, to the point where it has no significant influence on the circuit. Furthermore, the switching contacts are open at rest, instead of being closed. This means the high start up current is eliminated, as only milliamps (for the coil) flow until the reed starts vibrating. The driving coil is thus exposed to the full battery voltage and always starts reliably. Even if battery voltage should be so low as to prevent starting, no harm is done because only the high resistance driving coil is in circuit.
This ad excerpt from 1939 lists some important innovations from the Utah Radio Products Co.
This Electronic Laboratories 331 full wave eliminator was available by mid 1933. The rectifier is the new full wave indirectly heated type 84. Note the shunt drive coil.
The 50,60,70, and 80 Full Wave Elkonodes.
With these obvious improvements, Mallory had to follow suit, despite Utah's patents. This resulted in the 50, 60, 70, and 80 series Elkonodes, which are of the familiar modern full wave vibrator design.
As previously, the G and F prefixes denote 12 and 32V respectively. By 1935 the "Elkonode" name was dropped, giving way to the generic "Vibrator" as used by every other manufacturer.
Drawing of the later full wave Elkonodes. These are the basis of the 'modern' vibrator.
A further improvement on the shunt drive
design, used by some other vibrator manufacturers, was to have the drive
coil was switched by its own contacts. An early example of this was the
synchronous vibrator used in the RCA M34 car radio from 1933. This greatly
extended vibrator life because the high power switching contact condition
had no effect on the vibrator starting, or the vibration amplitude. As
the driving coil only requires a couple of hundred milliamps, its contact
life becomes a non issue. In 1934, Oak Manufacturing patented an improvement
on the separate coil drive method, whereby a short circuited winding on
the driving coil prevented arcing on the driving coil contacts, dispensing
with the usual suppression components. The short circuited winding slows
the rate of flux collapse when the contacts open so there is insufficient
back EMF to create an arc. Mallory did not take up the separate driving
coil contact method with much enthusiasm, apparently due to increased cost
and complexity, except for a few non standard and 2 volt types, and neither
did many of the other manufacturers. Nevertheless, Mallory seem to have
perfected their shunt drive vibrator design to the point that there probably
isn't much difference in operating life.
Oak Manufacturing, and a few others, used separate contacts for the driving coil. This type of vibrator will always start and maintain correct reed vibration, irrespective of the condition of the power switching contacts.
Mallory had dropped the "Elkonode" name by 1935 and all types were full wave.
Vibrator repair & adjustment.
Servicemen were expected to repair and adjust Elkonodes and other early vibrators because of their cost, and that attention may be required relatively frequently. One source claims that the Elkonode is guaranteed to run for 2000 hours without adjustment. A potential problem arises in that given its critical nature, incorrect adjustment can be detrimental to operation and life. It needs to be remembered that in the early 1930's that cathode ray tube technology was still very primitive and the idea of a serviceman having an oscilloscope to properly set up a vibrator just didn't exist. So, servicing instructions for vibrators are based around specific size contact gaps and adjusting for minimum sparking. Clearly, this is not very accurate, and it can be seen that the reputation of the vibrator's reliability therefore is at stake. Furthermore, a ham fisted serviceman is likely to lead his customers to believe that the Elkonode is a poor quality device, because he is not overly familiar with vibrator power supplies and/or does not follow Mallory's service notes exactly.
After a year of seeing the problems of servicemen repairing their Elkonodes, Mallory no longer provided service instructions or parts. Many manufacturers started sealing vibrators with a crimped edge around the base of the can. This was to discourage servicing, and to make it obvious if a vibrator had been serviced. With the improvements in vibrator technology by this time, it was possible for manufacturers to make a unit that would remain in adjustment, and it was felt better not to have this interfered with. Any short life problems therefore would be the fault of other components in the set, and not the vibrator.
Fortunately, and particularly for Australian vintage electronics enthusiasts in the modern day, not all manufacturers did seal their vibrator cans. Oak and early Ferrocart types are among the types which are easily dismantled.
A home-made B eliminator.
An article in Radio Craft for November 1934 describes a crude attempt at constructing a half-wave eliminator. It uses an interrupter made from Model T Ford ignition coil points which has been obviously based on the Elkonode design.
Essential diagrams for the home made eliminator. The coil is about 30 turns of No.16 wire. A piece of wire is soldered to the end of the vibrator to add weight.
For someone who wants to get an idea of
what an Elkonode eliminator is like, this is probably a good starting point.
The chances of finding an original one are minimal, so it's easier to make
Model T coil points are still manufactured and inexpensive. Alternatively, they may be obtained from defective ignition coils. The transformer described is home made, but it would obviously be easier to use a commercially made mains transformer in reverse. A transformer rated at 240 to 6V at a couple of amps is probably a good choice to try.
However, there are a number of deficiencies with the design as shown. Firstly, the capacitor across the points will do nothing to reduce sparking. It will need to be increased considerably, to maybe .5 or 1uF. The method of using an audio triode valve as a rectifier is appropriate for the time, but is not to be recommended now. Firstly, having its heater powered from the vibrator transformer will subtract from the power available. It will also be difficult to maintain the exact heater voltage without it varying under different conditions. A conventional directly heated rectifier such as a 6X4 would be better, with its heater powered directly from the battery.
A phantom load relay system might be required to load the circuit prior to warm up, and a suitably determined buffer capacitor will have to be installed. Finally, before it can be used with a radio receiver, various RFI suppression components will need to be added.
Combined Interrupter and transformer.
A few manufacturers designed B eliminators that had the interrupter as part of the transformer. This is reminiscent of the Model T Ford coil approach, although a lot more refined and efficient. However, the problems still exist of the series type of vibrator; i.e. high current flow at switch on because the contacts are closed, and vibration being dependent on load. Typical of the half wave design is this Mission Bell 19 car radio:
The rectifier valve is not designated but is mostly likely a 1V. Aside from the eliminator circuit, note the interesting full wave 2nd detector.
This Oak eliminator from mid 1933 also excites the vibrator reed from the transformer leakage flux, but is full wave. Similarly, the filter choke actuates the phantom load relay contacts.
The B Tube
This curious looking novelty, from mid 1932, was another variation of the vibrator theme. A half wave vibrator was actually mounted inside an evacuated glass tube, just like an ordinary radio valve. This was done in attempt to stop the contacts oxidising because of the arcing. The theory was that without air, the contacts cannot oxidise.
Note that the driving coil is in parallel with the transformer primary. It can also be connected in series, Elkonode style. Apparently the 37 valve used in the prototype had mercury introduced into it to reduce voltage drop as a rectifier. It is not clear if this device was ever put into production. It can be imagined that this method of vibrator construction would be more expensive, and looking at the weighty mechanism supported only by the glass pinch, rather fragile for automotive use.
It is interesting to note however, that the idea of a gas tight vibrator was revived later on. During World War 2 with aircraft flying at high altitudes, it was found necessary for vibrators to be filled with nitrogen to prevent contact arcing which becomes problematic at low air pressure..
By 1956, transistor technology had advanced
sufficiently to provide a few watts of audio output from a 12V supply.
This resulted in the first hybrid car radios in the U.S., and from here
onwards the days of vibrator power supplies were numbered. These hybrid
sets retained valves for the front end but had a transistor audio stage.
The main reason for a high voltage supply in an ordinary valve set
(and thus the vibrator) is to provide sufficient audio output power. It
is also worth noting the change from 6V to 12V by American car manufacturers
starting in 1954. The "front end" valves actually work quite well with
a 12V plate and screen supply, but audio outputs of only a few milliwatts
are available from conventional valves. RF performance of the then available
transistors was inferior to valves, hence the reluctance to use them for
the front end circuit. There was also the problem of early germanium transistors
being very temperature sensitive, which is problematic inside a car on
a hot day. With everything being now able to work from 12V, there was obviously
no need for the vibrator, power transformer, and rectifier.
In the case of mobile two way radios where the high B+ was still essential for VHF operation and transmitter power output, transistors began eliminating the vibrator directly, and solid state plug in replacements for mechanical vibrators started to appear. Today, the only "vibrator" that is manufactured is the solid state replacement.
In the U.S., all-valve car radios were no longer being made after about 1961. In Australia, AWA continued making all-valve car sets up until 1965, along with hybrid and all transistor models, and was the last manufacturer to do so. Vibrators lived on through the 1960's otherwise, with inverters, and in the U.S., with CB radios. Vibrator manufacturing came to an end in Australia around 1973.
The first attempts at vibrator construction,
based on Victorian era induction coil practice, were largely by trial and
error, on the basis of what circuit configuration and materials used for
the vibrator gave the longest life. However, the science began to be understood,
and development started to follow a sound reasoning. It is an amazing achievement
when one actually realises the technology that went into the modern vibrator.
How many people know that the grain direction of the tungsten is important,
for example? To most they're "just contacts". That those contacts could
stand up to being hammered millions of times without their characteristics
changing is really quite amazing. How many think about the contact support
metallurgy being important, so that the contacts do not change in position
The "it's just a glorified buzzer" mentality may apply to early induction coils, but has no place in the vibrator world, and it's that assumption which gets so many restorers into strife, causing them to give up and reach for a solid state substitute. Sort of like replacing all the valve circuitry in a radio with an IC based module.
Unfortunately, vibrators are one of the most misunderstood electronic components and have acquired an undeservedly bad reputation. Yet, when understood and used correctly, it has been my experience that they are an extremely reliable component, with a life so long it just doesn't need to be worried about.
This is an appalling example of the ignorant, misinformed, and factually incorrect attitude that exists about vibrator power supplies.
On the contrary, the vibrator is a precision
component, made to work reliably within a certain set of conditions. It's
hardly a vibrator's fault if it fails because someone thought "near enough
should be OK" for the buffer capacitor...that is if they even bothered
to replace the old leaky original. Or that there was a transformer fault,
incorrect loading, and so on.
The fact that Mallory published a book containing 129 pages on the subject, should cause one to discount the simple "buzzer" theory.
While the Elkonode design only lasted two years, it kick started the car radio and vibrator industry and all the improvements that ensued. It would be a curious thing to find a complete Elkon eliminator today. How long did they really survive for? Were they simply replaced with a full wave vibrator and transformer if they failed? The Radiart catalog still shows the half wave single and dual reed Elkonodes in 1945, but as recently discontinued. The Mallory catalog of the same era does not show any half wave Elkonodes.
Not just Mallory, but other manufacturers
needed to be credited for making their contribution to the improvement
in vibrator technology. Utah, Oak, ATR, Electronic Laboratories, Radiart,
James, Aerovox, Cornell Dubilier, and so on. In fact, the timing for vibrator
development couldn't have been better. The design had been perfected in
time for WW2, when aircraft and other mobile and portable communication
apparatus could take advantage of it. Straight after, when peace returned,
there was the explosion of automobile ownership - and the desire, in the
U.S. at least, for radios to be fitted to said automobiles. Millions of
vibrators were made for this and the ensuing replacement market. As any
1950's radio magazine from the U.S. shows from its advertisements, vibrators
were big business.
Sadly, with the advent of the power transistor in the mid 1950's, the days of the vibrator were numbered. Not only could the vibrator contacts be replaced by transistors, but soon there would not even be a need for a high voltage B+ supply in the first place. Fortunately, vibrators can and should live on in the modern day, in the hands of the vintage technology enthusiast, who is prepared to fully understand these devices of wonderment.
This sensible man has his priorities right! The Mallory Vibrapack is a self contained vibrator power supply which can be used stand-alone, or built into equipment. An advantage of this is that the equipment manufacturer does not have to understand the finer points of vibrator design - this is all taken care of by Mallory. Radiart had their self contained vibrator power supply under the "Vipower" name.
Fundamentals of Vibrator Power Supply Design by Mallory (13.6Mb).
Mallory Yaxley Encyclopedia (70.4Mb). See pp64-92.
A Practical Guide to Vibrator Power Supplies. December 2015 Silicon Chip article (for subscribers only, or those who bought the magazine).