Ramblings from a travelling manager

graffiti (25k image)

Home
Archives
About me (Den)

Greymatter Forums

July 2009
SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Saturday, July 11th

Autofocus 2 - so far, so good


I thought I had better report back on how I have gone so far with Autofocus 2 within my return to GTD. I'm now using a notebook with tabs so that I have my task lists on paper, divided into fairly broad contexts: @Work, @Home, @Errands, @Someday, @Waiting For and @Projects.

In my original GTD implementation, I had others like, @Calls, @Internet, @Computer and the like, and this is where I went wrong. I always have my phone with me, so I don't bother with @Calls now. I place work based calls under @Work and personal calls under @Home. I can also access a PC in most locations using my work laptop or home PC, so again, I tend to now lump PC based activities on my task list for work or home, rather than have a separate area for my PC stuff.

So how does Autofocus 2 come into this? When I am reviewing my list and trying to work out which task to do next, I simply follow the Autofocus 2 rules to the letter. I also strictly dismiss incomplete tasks as per the rules as well, no exceptions. This has quickly nipped my tendency to keep putting off unpleasant tasks in the bud, and I am definitely getting more stuff done.

Last but not least, the process of always starting at the most recent end of a task list each time is keeping me aware of urgent, short notice tasks that arise during the day.

I will stop writing further about Autofocus 2 for a while and move onto other topics, but I'll post an update in a couple of months, or sooner if I scrap my system (again)!

Later.
den on 07.11.09 @ 04:40 AM GMT+8 [link] [No Comments]


Tuesday, June 30th

Autofocus 2 - yes I know, I said I would resist


Despite saying I must not try it, I had a read through Mark Forster's blog post describing Autofocus 2 and the changes from Autofocus.

...and I must say it looks compelling. The idea of starting with your most recent (and often most urgent) tasks on your list, but still having a forced dismissmal process for neglected tasks might just work, especially for me. I'm going to still work it using GTD with contexts to split up my list, but I'm going to try using AF2 to determine which tasks I do when within each context.

I can even see a way to do this electronically which always appeals to my inner geek, but I will stick with paper for now. I found it so refreshing and liberating to go to paper after using Outlook for so long, so I will continue enjoying that, at least for the time being.

I'll come back with my thoughts on how well it works in a week or so.

Later.

den on 06.30.09 @ 08:45 PM GMT+8 [link] [No Comments]


Saturday, June 27th

The end of Autofocus?


Yes, after raving about how well it works, I'm going to stop Autofocus, and revert to GTD. This doesn't mean that Autofocus was a complete failure, it was actually a resounding success. You're probably thinking WTF, but hang on, and let me explain.

Despite the initial suspicion that Autofocus is basically one big long to-do list, it works quite differently, in that it combines your conscious and sub-conscious mental processes to address tasks that stand out to be done, and has a good dismissal function for removing stuff that ultimately doesn't need to be done. The sweeping of the list one page at a time also ensures that I am regularly reviewing my list, and it almost becomes a smaller version of the classic GTD weekly review but on a daily or even more frequent basis.

The massive breakthrough for me however was the discovery of pen and paper as my main task list manager. When I implemented GTD, I used a combination of Outlook tasks and my Blackberry, and I thought this was the perfect system. Unfortunately I started to run into task list overload, which then resulted in my previous posts on whether I should use a Next Action category, which I originally picked up from Jello GTD. It seemed like a good idea at the time, picking out and flagging the tasks I need to get done soon, but it kept growing, and other new tasks were being overlooked because they were getting to the Next category while other tasks were incomplete. Or, if I added them to the Next category, it ended up becoming very full, and the ability to pick out what is due next was diluted.

It also didn't help that my GTD system had WAY too many categories/contexts...

Changing to paper to test drive Autofocus, I was stunned with how easy it was to get tasks on the list quickly. I didn't have to transfer actions from my meeting notes, telephone conversations or emails, because I could add them to my paper system as they arose, wherever I was at the time. No lost tasks, no lost actions. I also found that reviewing the list on paper to find out the task that stood out to be acted on sooner rather than later was again much more intuitive, than reviewing a window full of tasks in Outlook, or scrolling through a long list on my Blackberry's sharp, but still relatively small screen.

I love technology, but there's a lot to be said for the instant accessibility of pen and paper.

So again, why quit Autofocus and return to GTD? Simple. It all comes down to categories or contexts.

I have a few different contexts in which I get stuff done, and I kept finding with Autofocus, that I had tasks on my active page that I could not do because of where I was at the time. At first it was OK, and I would instead push stuff to the last page, or dismiss something if it wasn't urgent and rely on it coming up again later, which was typically the case. After a while though, this constant bumping into tasks I could not progress became a pain, and I would become quite frustrated knowing that I could only do certain tasks at a certain time or in a certain location, and having to run through my entire task list to try and pick out which task to progress. Some basic categorisation makes all the difference.

So what is my system now?

GTD, but with fewer contexts than I had before, and strictly paper based for my next action and project lists. This should give me the best of both worlds. I'll test drive this for a few weeks, and then let you know how I go. I have a feeling this is going to work this time, but alas, I have thought that before.

Later.

PS: Of course just after I posted this, I then saw that Mark Forster is going to release Autofocus 2 on his website tomorrow.

Must. Resist. Constantly. Trying. New. Productivity. Systems. And. Actually. Get. Stuff. Done.

den on 06.27.09 @ 09:51 AM GMT+8 [link] [No Comments]


Monday, June 8th

Windows 7 - should I try the release candidate?


I'm been tempted to jump in and try the Windows 7 release candidate for a while now. In the past, I've had a look at new Windows releases whenever I've been lucky enough to score access to one. I once managed to get a beta copy of Chicago (aka Windows 95) on floppies, and have had a fiddle with new pre-release Windows versions at every opportunity since. Windows 7 holds particular appeal because let's face it, Vista failed to live up to its promise. It's nice enough, but it just feels so rough around the edges and seems to waste machine resources.

My wife's Acer laptop has been running like a real dog lately. It came with Vista Home, and while it was OK at first, it is really starting to bog down now, particular when my better half starts working on large image files. Yes, she's giving it a fair bit to do, but this PC would sing if it was doing it under XP. Vista clearly has resource management issues, and also seems to swallow up hard disk space with temporary files etc at a great rate of knots.

Well, I thought stuff it yesterday, so I grabbed a product key, downloaded the release candidate iso from Microsoft and away we went. I chose the easy upgrade option. I know this should not give as a good a result as a clean installation, but I couldn't be bothered.

Early impressions are favourable. The installation went ahead with barely a hitch (low available disk space warning only) and apart from a couple of minor applications that we don't use (Acer utilities), everything else came back as being Windows 7 compatible.

Even better, the machine runs much more smoothly now. If anything surprising comes up, I'll post it. As I say though, it is looking good so far, and if it keeps this up, I'll need to purchase a legit copy before this release candidate expires next year!
den on 06.08.09 @ 01:32 PM GMT+8 [link] [No Comments]


Friday, June 5th

Valkyrie - A Tom Cruise movie I really enjoyed


A break from my Autofocus posts of late. On the way home from my last business trip, I "had" to watch a movie on the plane over dinner. You know how it is. You really need to get some work done so you pull out the laptop and get into it, only to have the hostie tap you on the shoulder and ask you if you're having dinner. You're starving so you give up the work for an hour (or so), and you may as well watch something right?

I selected Valkyrie...and thoroughly enjoyed it. Yes, it has Tom Cruise, and after all the tabloid press about the issues he faced in Germany while making it due to his beliefs in Scientology, and the fact that Tom plays Tom best, rather than really fleshing out his characters sometimes, I had fairly low expectations. But, it was actually very good. I found myself really hoping they were going to be successful in taking out Hitler, even though history tells us that the plot failed, they were caught and then executed.

The other cast members were excellent too. I always enjoy seeing Bill Nighy in minor and major roles, and this was no exception.

The bottom line, if you enjoy a gritty war drama that is based on a true story, and you'd like to be left thinking, "what would be different if they'd been successful?" you could do a lot worse than Valkyrie.

PS: As an aside, I saw Defiance at home last night. Brilliant.
den on 06.05.09 @ 12:03 AM GMT+8 [link] [No Comments]