Copyright © 2002, Pàdraig MacIain
Permission is given to distribute this by any means given that the
above copyright notice is kept intact with the artcle.
Version 1.0 : 2002-05-30
An interesting point was raised on a mailing list. The person, a great
craftsman, said, that he knew what Celtic Reconstructionalism wasn't but
did not know what it was. So as a result of that comment I have come to
write this small text in order to try to illustrate what I think it is
to be a Celtic Reconstructionalist pagan / heathen. Of course, this is
built up from my opinions, and observations and not everyone that is a
CR may agree with them.
Community is the most important part of being a Celt. Those that are
part of your group are more than just like minded individuals, they
become your brothers and sisters. Lending assistance when needed becomes
second nature.
Some groups are able to live this community quite strongly, and are
building small villages, all self funded. Others unfortunately suffer
from our modern living structures and have to travel to visit each
other, but their sense of brotherhood is not dimished.
The idea of community goes beyond the close-knit group that makes up a
Tuath, interaction with other CR groups, and related groups (Asatru for
instance) is enjoyed and encouraged. This shown in most CR groups having
a general policy of 'open rituals', that allows anyone to attend (whilst
obviously following certain rules of etiquette). Ritual is not a closed
circle, designed for the initiated, but a family and community affair
where the Gods are honoured for the benefit of everyone.
Being hospitable to everyone, offering food and a bed when needed is a
mix of altruism, concern for the divine and an announcement of wealth.
Being able to provide food and a bed for a stranger in need shows
compassion for mankind, but it helps reassert the strength of the Tuath,
and if the Tuath is strong, the Land benefits sympathetically. And one
never knows whether it is Manannan or the Morrighan that is visiting
your house.
Most of us have grown up speaking English, but within the CR idealology
is the need to learn the native languages of the Celtic people. It is
felt that to truely understand a culture, you have to understand their
language. This becomes even truer, when you consider the vast wealth of
lore, mythology and poetry available in the native languages.
Of course, there is divisions, some groups feel that learning Old Irish
is more vital, as it gives a direct connection to the lore, whereas some
groups feel that learning the Celtic langauge of a living Celtic nation
is more product, such as Gaelic, Irish or Welsh. The groups all hold an
ideal of being able to perform all litany in the Celtic languages.
As an example, I am learning Gaelic (Gàidhlig, or Scottish-Gaelic),
which does not let me read the older texts (well, not much at least),
however, it gives me access to a wealth of folklore and poetry from
Scotland. As I become more fluent in Gaelic, I will start learning Old
Irish, so that I can read the original texts myself.
Ritual in CR groups are broken into two types. Daily rituals (often
private) and communal rituals. Both of these provide problems as we have
no direct records of any rituals performed by the pre-Christian celtic
peoples. The few rituals documented by the Romans appear to be very
biased, and inaccurate. And the Christian scribes that recorded the
mythologies of the Irish people appeared not to be inclined to be very
truthful at all.
Private, daily rituals however have a life-line. Through the folk
practices that have been documented during the last few hundred years in
such works as the Carmina Gadelica, The Secret Commonwealth and more
recently A Handbook of the Scottish Gaelic World. Although these
practices exist within a christian culture, the essense of the ritual
practices can be extracted with research and a touch of intuitition.
Infact many documented practices have little or no reference to any
parts of christianity, so using them is easier still.
Communial rituals however, are a thorny problem. We have descriptions of
bloody massacres from Julius Caesar's the Gallic Wars, and broad hints
at rituals in the medieval literature. So, we become a little stuck. We
can discover the signicant aspects of various ritual times, by once
again, looking at folk practices. Although from these we have more
problem, the folk practices are enacted by villages full of people,
rather than a close knit Tuath. It is here we have to do some
intellectual leaping, and look to the closest cousins of the celtic
people, the Germanics. We are now saved, through using Asatru as spring
board, we can build a communal ritual structure. The sumbels and blots
are good foundations for Celtic ritual structure, and by overlaying the
themes that each festival produces, a ritual can be enacted.
It should also realised that a distinction has to be held between
historically based practices (one we have sufficient evidence for) and
inspired practices (ones that we have little or no direct evidence for).
By not creating and recognizing the distinction, a CR would fall into
the same trap many neo-pagan writers fall into, and futher mislead those
would would read anything they contribute.
Not everyone is born to be a priest, not everyone wants to. They just
want to live their life and honour the Gods. Public rituals are
generally lead by the clergy (Draoi) or the chieften (Ceann or Righ),
whilst the Tuath themselves participate, swear oaths and make their
offerings. A Tuath has both spiritual and secular functions, so not
everyone need to be highly fluent in the spiritual aspect. This is
contrary to contemporary paganism.