
Science as dogma
The Melbourne Age
Letters, May 5, 2005
You report Dr Rajendra
Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as saying:
"But you can't keep questioning the science forever, because if you do, you only
postpone action" ("World should look beyond Kyoto, climate expert says"; below).
I have news for Dr
Pachauri. "Questioning the science" is exactly what scientists, all of them, are
paid to do.
The day that a science hypothesis (that dangerous human-caused global warming is
occurring) becomes an established dogma is the day that propaganda and politics
takes over. Sadly, from Dr Pachauri's comments overall, one has to conclude that
is precisely the fate that has befallen the IPCC.
Professor Bob Carter
Marine Geophysical
Laboratory, Qld
World should look
beyond Kyoto: climate expert
The Melbourne Age
News Report,
May 4,
2005
Debate about climate change needs to shift from the Kyoto Protocol to the level
of global warming that is "dangerous", the head of the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says.
Rajendra Pachauri said the world urgently needed to decide the level at which
greenhouse gases should be stabilised and work towards that goal.
"Unfortunately, a great deal of effort has been wasted just debating and
discussing the Kyoto Protocol," said Dr Pachauri, who will address an
international air pollution conference in Hobart today. "And I think what we
really need is to focus on some longer-term targets."
Many of the world's climate-change scientists are now debating the issue of
"dangerous" global warming. Dr Pachauri said this was a subjective thing: a
small island state might feel existing global warming is already dangerous
while, in Australia, one more degree in average temperatures would begin to kill
coral reefs.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change supervises the work of 2500
scientists who assess global warming science and model what may happen in the
future to advise governments.
He was unfussed about Australia snubbing the Kyoto Protocol. The international
agreement to reduce global-warming pollution would generate a momentum of its
own, he said. But countries such as Australia and the US, the only other major
developed country outside the framework, should play a large role in repairing
the trust between rich and poor nations over global warming.
The Federal Government has argued that it should not sign the protocol because
poorer countries - which will become big emitters as they develop in the next
decades - were not asked to set targets.
But Dr Pachauri, an Indian, said the spirit of Kyoto was that rich countries
first take action on a problem they created with the pollution of the past 150
years of industrialisation. The other principle was that developing nations
would not be denied the right to progress and better living standards, but
richer nations would help with cleaner technology.
"There's been an enormous loss of confidence. If you go back to 1992 there was a
totally different spirit... Developing countries were, by and large, quite
willing to do something. Then it took five years for the Kyoto Protocol to be
agreed on. Then after that, there's been such a delay in its ratification," Dr
Pachauri said.
Unless this loss of confidence was repaired, developing countries would not make
any commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, he said. "You need to see the
developed countries do a lot more and particularly those that are not part of
the Kyoto Protocol."
He said he was particularly concerned that poorer nations would bear the brunt
of climate change's worst impacts.
He believes he is winning his battle with global warming sceptics - many of whom
belong to, or are connected with, think tanks funded by oil company Exxon Mobil.
"They are showing signs of desperation," he said. "They see the scientific
community (getting) so much support and having so much conviction, so they feel
insecure.
"I wish them well and hope we always have sceptics. Because scientists are no
angels. They can get carried away, some are very arrogant... But you can't keep
questioning the science forever, because if you do, you only postpone action."
The intergovernmental panel's next report is due in 2007. The last one, which
connected human activity to the warming of the planet, was published in 2001.
Melissa Fyfe
