|
Located: research
topics > site planning
User-centred structures in designing web
usability
Author: Dr.
Jakob Nielsen (1999)
Abstract: This research looks at two chapters (chapter 2
- page design, and chapter 4 - site design) in Nielsen's latest
book 'Designing Web Usability: the Practice of Simplicity'. The
sections offer a number of rules aimed at assisting users reach
their goals within a website.
Web pages are still
essentially a one-dimensional scroll similar to those used
by Egyptians (p5)
10 million sites in
the world (Jan 2000), users insist on instant gratification. In
software customers pay first and experience usability second
on the web they experience first and pay second. Competition
is not limited to similar sites with like products (p10-11).
There are two basic
approaches to design the artistic idea of expressing yourself
and the engineering idea of solving a problem (p11). I
don't agree with this tenet - the Bauhaus objective of functionality,
and many design schools since, practice problem solving. The perceived
dichotomy is perhaps where a pure engineering approach solves only
part of the problem.
Bad usability = bad
service = less customers
Site
structure should mirror user tasks, not company structures (ie p184-185).
The user controls navigation and can take paths never intended by
the designer. (p25) Do not trap users they are in control
of their own destiny you don't own them (p66). The
idea of a user-centred structure is consistent with views by Bezos,
Tognazzini and Fleming.
In nearly every usability
study, users ask for page delivery to be sped up. 10 seconds is
the limit of people's ability to focus attention while waiting (p42).
There
are three basic types of links: embedded (underlined text further
explaining a topic), structural (links to hierarchical elements)
and associative (links to similar interest and topic areas).
(p195)
Links
to 'more of the same' and further reading are one of the most effective
ways to lift site use. (p56). It is critical to retain link colouring
standards blue and purple when not retained the users'
sense of structure and location is significantly reduced. Links
should also be descriptive and give feedback.
Links to downloads
on a home page why would anyone reduce usability of their
own site by giving another company free advertising? (p84)
It is necessary to
have an explicit link called home on every page not all users
understand clicking on the logo takes them home. (p178)
For information behind
a registration wall, allow for incoming links particularly
with free or open pages giving samples of what to expect. (p76)
Up to 30% of users
who click on banners that go to corporate home pages immediately
click back. Broken promises in banner advertising are particularly
damaging to credibility. (p77)
From a usability perspective,
site design is more important that page design. (p163)
Home pages should
have three basic elements navigation directory, news and promotions
and search. The question "what can
this site do for me?" should be answered. (p164)
The
three fundamentals of navigation are where am I, where have I been
and where can I go? Usability studies show users complain bitterly
when a site uses navigation and interfaces different from the ones
they have come to expect (p189). These
two are critical issues, and relate to the principles of giving
user status and feedback information, and giving users consistency.
Principle navigation
tools include: moving up a level in the hierarchy, features for
visualising structure and relationships of pages, moving to next
and previous elements in a sequence, search to show main areas of
site which mach a query. (p189)
Navigation,
by definition, needs to show available alternatives at the same
time so users can make choices and informed decisions. This
counters many types of navigation now offered by DHMTL and layers.
Navigation visualises a user's current
location and alternative movements relative to structure of underlying
information architecture. (p198) User-centred navigation is the
difference between success and failure of trying to sell anything
online. (eg P202)
Site structures: Most
have hierarchical structures ( progressively more detailed info
as descending into hierarchies). Other common structures include
tabular structures (classified relative to parameters or attributes
(ie town or date or topic), or linear structures (a progression
of steps). It is important to have a structure that mirrors user
requirements (a customer focus) (p198). Linear structures are mostly
poor because the web is inherently non-linear in nature.
Cursive
(breadcrumb links) are important because they give essential locational
feedback. The possibility
of cursive links, that when moused over gave other links in the
same hierarchy level, would fit the need for showing alternatives
and context, while still filling feedback requirements. This fulfils
the need for sitemaps (user requirement p221) and ads the
'you are here' feature.
Subsites are effective
for info structures that need more than simple hierarchical structures.
They are worthwhile for creating a home environment for a particular
class of users (p223). This has
synergies with niche publishing and target market principles.
Slightly
more than 50% of all users are search dominant (task oriented),
20% are link dominant (exploring in nature) and the rest mixed behaviour
(use whatever is most promising practical).
This has serious ramifications for
navigation design, particularly when considering flow patterns.
Navigation schemes are still important because they give context
feedback to searchers.
Care needs to be exercised
in scoped searches many users do not understand this function
plenty of feedback is needed include an option to widen
search. Consider chunking information if it gives better feedback
(ie p235).
The size of the search
box should allow longer text strings (p240), and search box at top
right became a convention in 1999.
Running words together
is the most popular form of URL. Beware of the problems associated
with virtual and archival URLs in dynamic content.
 
|