Dr Jay Kirkpatrick,Ph.D.,
Director of Science and Conservation Biology,
Zoomontana,
2100 South Shiloh Road,
Billings,
Montana 59106

March 21,1996

Dear Mrs Wegner,

Thanks for your letter of February 27th, regarding viral vectored contraceptives. Sorry for the delay in answering, but I have been on Assateague Island treating wild horses with our contraceptive vaccine. The issue of how American scientists view this sort of research is really irrelevant, largely because of our federal regulatory agencies. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are but a few of the federal regulatory agencies that oversee this sort of research, and beyond that, we have state agencies that also must review and approve wildlife contraceptive research. Thus, the bigger question is what the agencies think of this sort of research. The thoughts of the scientists themselves are almost irrelevant.

In our own case for example, where we deliver a non-specific contraceptive vaccine by means of a very specific delivery system - darts - every project we carry out must be reviewed and approved by the FDA and the appropriate state agencies before we can start work. We have been told that any oral contraceptives - which we don’t use - must be species-specific.

Quite a few years ago, some researchers in California wanted to test a genetically-engineered bacterium that would potentially prevent frost on strawberry plants. Now that is a rather benign piece of research, but it took 6 years of court battles and countless hearings to get final approval to test the bacterium. My point here is that our regulatory agencies here in the U.S. would never permit such an approach. I hope these thoughts are of some help to you.

Cordially.

Jay F.Kirkpatrick. Ph. D.
Director of Science and Conservation Biology