Stephen E. Jones

Creation/Evolution Quotes: Unclassified quotes: May-Dec 2009

[Home] [Updates] [Site map] [My Quotes; C/E quotes: Unclassified, Classified] [CED blog]

The following are quotes added to my Unclassified Quotes database in May-Dec 2009. The date format is dd/mm/yy.
See copyright conditions at end.

[Index: Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec]


10/05/2009
"Fibrinolysis is the function of the body which helps regulate blood clotting. When a clot begins to be 
formed a series of steps takes place which prevents the completion of the forming of the clot. This 
protective function prevents heart attacks, strokes and other cardiovascular incidents. Excessive blood 
clotting - thrombosis - is caused by a decrease in the fibrinolytic activity of elements of the blood and this 
is called `fibrinolytic dysfunction.' As we are learning, the cardiometabolic risk syndrome is associated with 
many abnormalities and one of the most common is an increased tendency for the blood to form clots. The 
flow of blood to the organs in the body is critical to the survival of the individual and to the proper function 
of the body. If the blood is sluggish or tends to clot too fast, the body will suffer; if the blood is too `thin' or 
does not clot, the body will suffer. The balance between blood clotting and blood not clotting is one of the 
most critical balancing acts in the human body. The mechanisms which control those functions are complex. 
The following diagram shows the complex relationships which control the balance between blood clotting - 
which is called `thrombus' - and blood not clotting - which is called `fibrinolysis.' The reality is that too 
much blood clotting is bad but not enough clotting is also bad. On the other hand, too much dissolving of 
blood clots (fibrinolysis) is bad and too little dissolving of blood clots is bad. It isecessary for you to 
learn or even to understand all of these steps. What is necessary is for you to have a mental picture of the 
complex processes which continually take place in your body to make certain that your blood can flow to 
provide oxygen and nutrients to your cells and to make certain that your blood flow can be stopped if you 
are injured." (Holly, J.L., "Cardiometabolic Risk Syndrome Part V: Fibrinolytic Dysfunction," Your Life 
Your Heath - The Examiner, January 11, 2007).

5/12/2009
"Cumulative selection is the key but it had to get started, and we cannot escape the need to postulate a 
single-step chance event in the origin of cumulative selection itself. And that vital first step was a difficult 
one because, at its heart, there lies what seems to be a paradox. The replication processes that we know 
seem to need complicated machinery to work ... The theory of the blind watchmaker is extremely powerful 
given that we are allowed to assume replication and hence cumulative selection. But if replication needs 
complex machinery, since the only way we know for complex machinery ultimately to come into existence is 
cumulative selection, we have a problem. Certainly the modern cellular machinery, the apparatus of DNA 
replication and protein synthesis, h has all the hallmarks of a highly evolved, specially fashioned machine. .... 
At its own level of ultra-miniaturization, it is of the same order of elaborateness and complexity of design as 
the human eye .... an apparatus as complex as the human eye could not possibly come into existence 
through single-step selection. Unfortunately, the same seems to be true of at least parts of the apparatus of 
cellular machinery whereby DNA replicates itself .... So, cumulative selection can manufacture complexity 
while single-step selection cannot. But cumulative selection cannot work unless there is some minimal 
machinery of replication and replicator power, and the only machinery of replication that we know seems too 
complicated to have come into existence by means of anything less than many generations of cumulative 
selection! Some people see this as a fundamental flaw in the whole theory of the blind watchmaker. They see 
it as the ultimate proof that there must originally have been a designer, not a blind watchmaker but a far-
sighted supernatural watchmaker." (Dawkins, R., "The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution 
Reveals a Universe Without Design," W.W. Norton & Co: New York NY, 1986, pp.140-141. Emphasis 
original)

6/12/2009
"THE MOSAIC ACCOUNT OF CREATION This is found in Gen. 1 and 2. These Scriptures record the 
immediate and the mediate creation of the universe and of man. 1. The immediate creation of the 
universe. The opening statement of the Bible declares that 'in the beginning God created the heavens and 
earth' (Gen. 1:1). According to these words, the universe is neither eternal, nor formed out of pre-existing 
things, nor sprung from necessity, but due to the immediate creative act of God. It was created ex nihilo, 
that is, out of nothing. The doctrine of creation ex nihilo does not rest on the usage of the Hebrew word 
bara and the Greek word ktizein; for they are at times used interchangeably with the words asah and 
poiein Thus, God is said both to have `created' and `made' the world (Gen 1:1; Neh 9:6; Col. 1:16f.). But 
it is clear that in Gen. 1:1 and 2:3f., the word does mean to create out of nothing. Davis explains: `The verb 
bara' ('to create') expresses better than any other verb the idea of an absolute creation, or creation ex 
nihilo The qal stem of this verb is employed exclusively in the Old Testament for God's activity :; the 
subject of the verb is never man. God is said to create `the wind'; (Amos 4:13), `a clean heart' (Ps. 51 :10), 
and `new heavens and a new t; earth' (Isa. 65 :17). Genesis 1 emphasizes three great beginnings, each 
initiated by God (cf. 1:1, 21, 27).... The creative act of God reflected in verse 1, therefore, involved no 
preexisting material; a sovereign, all-powerful God created the heavens and the earth from nothing.' [Davis, 
Paradise to Prison, pp. 40, 41]" (Thiessen, H.C.* & Doerksen, V.D.*, "Lectures in Systematic Theology," 
[1949], Eerdmans: Grand Rapids MI, Revised, 1977, p.112. Emphasis original)

6/12/2009
"2. The mediate creation of the present universe Whether due to deliberate incompleteness in the original 
act of creation, or to some catastrophe that befell the original creation, we find in Gen. 1:2 that the earth was 
`formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep.' Then there follows the formation of the 
present order. Certain problems, therefore, are raised. a. was the creation immediate, mediate, or a 
combination of both? Some limit immediate creation to the act described in v. 1 and regard the rest of the 
chapter as mediate creation. Others see a combination of immediate and mediate creation throughout the 
entire chapter. The sun may have been included in the original creation, and the light (vss. 3-5) may have 
come from the sun. God, however, probably created light apart from the sun. The germs of vegetable life 
may have survived from a primitive condition, so that God needed merely to command the earth to `sprout 
vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit after their kind, with seed in them' (v. 11) . It 
seems more probable, though, that vegetation was directly created by God. In Gen. 2:19, we read, `And out 
of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the sky.' This would seem to 
teach the mediate creation of all animals, fish, fowl, reptiles, etc. (1:20-25), though surely animal life itself 
was directly created by God. And we are definitely informed that `the Lord God formed man of dust from 
the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life' (Gen. 2:7). This would show that he, too, was 
created mediately, as far as his body is concerned. Though man and animals were made of dust and return to 
dust, the soul of man was surely immediately created by God. " (Thiessen, H.C.* & Doerksen, V.D.*, 
"Lectures in Systematic Theology," [1949], Eerdmans: Grand Rapids MI, Revised, 1977, pp.112-113. 
Emphasis original)

* Authors with an asterisk against their name are believed not to be evolutionists. However, lack of
an asterisk does not necessarily mean that an author is an evolutionist.

[top]


Copyright © 2009-2010, by Stephen E. Jones. All rights reserved. These my quotes may be used
for non-commercial purposes only and may not be used in a book, ebook, CD, DVD, or any other
medium except the Internet, without my written permission. If used on the Internet, a link back
to this page would be appreciated.
Created: 10 May, 2009. Updated: 15 March, 2010.