Stephen E. Jones

Creation/Evolution Quotes: Unclassified quotes: March-April, 1999

[Home] [Updates] [Site map] [Quotes, Unclassified, Classified]

The following are unclassified quotes posted in my email messages in March-April, 1999.
The date format is dd/mm/yy. See copyright conditions at end.

[Index: May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov, Dec]

"In the middle sits the lone figure of Steve Jones, a man so universally sceptical that unless he had his birth 
certificate he would doubt his own existence." (Hurst, L., "The darling of the masses," New Scientist, 6 June 
1998, p.50)

"Palaeobiologists flocked to these scientific visions of a world in a constant state of flux and admixture. But 
instead of finding the slow, smooth and progressive changes Lyell and Darwin had expected, they saw in 
the fossil records rapid bursts of change, new species appearing seemingly out of nowhere and then 
remaining unchanged for millions of years-patterns hauntingly reminiscent of creation." (Pagel, M., "Happy 
accidents?" Review of "The Pattern of Evolution," by Niles Eldredge, W.H. Freeman, 1999. Nature, Vol. 25 
February 1999, pp.664-665, p.665).

"If ontogeny repeated phylogeny exactly, then an ancestor of man would have lived on milk all his life and a 
more remote ancestor would have spent his days attached to his mother by the umbilical cord!" (Cohen, J. & 
Massey, B., "Living Embryos," [1963], Pergamon Press: Oxford, Third Edition, 1982, p.149).

"The idea that the world is peculiarly adapted to the appearance of life is not a new one. In 1913, the 
biochemist L.J. Henderson pointed out that many substances such as water have precisely those properties 
required if life is to exist. Most biologists rejected his views, arguing that organisms are adapted to their 
environments by natural selection, not the other way around. But the questions he raised have surfaced 
again recently in a new form. It turns out that the physical constants have just the values required to ensure 
that the Universe contains stars with planets capable of supporting intelligent life. The 'cosmological 
anthropic principle' has been suggested as an explanation for this puzzling fact. The principle takes several 
forms. The weak anthropic principle merely states that certain universes, with unfortunate lists of physical 
constants, would not be observable by us, simply because we would not be there. The weak principle is not 
a theory: it merely acknowledges a peculiar situation. The strong principle, proposed by Brandon Carter, is 
more radical. It states that the Universe must have those properties that allow life to develop in it at some 
stage of its life history. How can this curious claim be understood? The simplest interpretation is that the 
Universe was designed by a creator who intended that intelligent life should evolve. This interpretation lies 
outside science." (Maynard Smith, J. & Szathmáry, E., "On the likelihood of habitable worlds," Nature, 
Vol. 384, 14 November 1996, p.107)

"Second, to put a correct view of the univeto people's heads we must first get an incorrect , "Billions and Billions of Demons." Review of "The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a 
Candle in the Dark," by Carl Sagan, The New York Times Review of Books, January 9, 1997, pp.28-32, 

"It looks to me as if Darwinians are like someone who, having observed that tugboats sometimes maneuver 
ocean liners in tight places by directing high-pressure streams of water at them, concludes that he has 
discovered the method by which the liners cross the Atlantic." (Van Inwagen, P., "Doubts About 
Darwinism," in Buell, J.* & Hearn, V.*, eds., "Darwinism: Science or Philosophy?" Foundation for Thought 
and Ethics: Richardson TX, 1994, p.186).

"Their report [Fleagle, J.G. & McGraw, W.S., "Skeletal and dental morphology supports diphyletic origin of 
baboons and mandrills," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA,Vol. 96, No. 3 , February 
2, 1999, pp.1157-1161] a case study in how evolution can dupe casual observers- building similarities into 
unrelated species and surprising differences into close cousins." (Holden, C., "When Is a Mandrill Not a 
Baboon?," Science, Vol. 283, 12 February 1999, p.931).

"But the main reason for believing in an ensemble of universes is that it could explain why the laws 
governing our Universe appear to be so finely tuned for our existence. In the 1950s, for instance, Fred Hoyle 
discovered that the step-by-step build-up of heavy elements inside stars depends on a series of spectacular 
coincidences. Only if the nuclei of beryllium-8, carbon-12 and oxygen-16 exist in particular energy states can 
hydrogen be built up into the elements of life such as calcium, magnesium and iron. This fine-tuning has two 
possible explanations. Either the Universe was designed specifically for us by a creator or there is a 
multitude of universes - a `multiverse'." (Chown, M., "Anything Goes," New Scientist, 6 June 1998, Vol. 158, 
pp.26-30, p.28).

"In considering the Origin of Species, it is quite conceivable that a naturalist, reflecting on the mutual 
affinities of organic beings, on their embryological relations, their geographical distribution, geological 
succession, and other such facts, might come to the conclusion that species had not been independently 
created, but had descended, like varieties, from other species. Nevertheless, such a conclusion, even if well 
founded, would be unsatisfactory, until it could be shown how the innumerable species inhabiting this world 
have been modified, so as to acquire that perfection of structure and coadaptation which justly excites our 
admiration." (Darwin, C.R., "The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection," Sixth Edition, 1872, 
John Murray: London, Reprinted, 1882, p.2).

* Authors with an asterisk against their name are believed not to be evolutionists. However, lack of
an asterisk does not necessarily mean that an author is an evolutionist.


Copyright © 1999-2010, by Stephen E. Jones. All rights reserved. These my quotes may be used for non-commercial purposes only and may not be used in a book, ebook, CD, DVD, or any other medium except the Internet, without my written permission. If used on the Internet, a link back to my home page at would be appreciated.
Created: 30 March, 2006. Updated: 6 May, 2010.