Question: Recently, the Kerala scientist Dr. Godfrey Louis and his research assistant Santhosh Kumar said samples of red rain that fell across the state of Kerala in India have been found to contain microscopic red cells of unknown origin . What's the relevance of this claim to your theory of panspermia? Could you also tell something about their latest conclusions?
Answer:If these red cells came from a comet, then it would surely be conclusive proof of cometary panspermia. The evidence to me suggests that a small injection of red rain cells from comets took place in July 2001, and this was somehow amplified in the clouds of our atmosphere. This is the only way I can understand the intermittent showers over several weeks, and the localization around Kerala. Incidentally this phenomenon was repeated in this present year July 2006, showing a 5–year cycle of incident particles.
Question:We heard that samples of this red rain was also sent io Cardiff for testing. What did you find? Could these also be aliens showering on earth after traveling on a comet?
Answer: I think more work needs to be done, but this could well be the smoking gun for panspermia.

[Mr Greer] ‘I was asking people to begin to be seated, that Raven Nabulsi took a remarkable photograph of an ET being floating above our
chairs to the east, looking directly at the camera’.

The day of my findings Feb 22nd, I posted my result on the Net I than received a reply with Insight from Harold a former CSETI field team member

You know I have often wondered about various photos which have been proposed to show figures, buildings, structures, beings etc and most of these have been regarding photos of either Mars or the Moon and unless you have a trained (forensic) eye forget it.......
...I have been in the field with these people a few years backand quite frankly I…ve seen and “experienced” many anomalous events that went way beyond explainable. I found CSETI and the Diclosure Project after I had my own sighting back in Aug of 2004 which took me on this incredible ride. After finding every kooky UFO group out there I ran into Dr. Greer's Disclosure Project and anyone who takes the time to really look at some of the findings will also soon understand that this reality has many strange (high-strangeness) aspects. Unfortunately many people who have not delved down the Rabbit Hole deep enough (so to speak) and have not really looked at these aspects that are so very strange to Humans based on their current understanding of existence the easiest way to explain things and their first reflex is to go to the “giggle factor”! NOW I am NOT saying this is actually what they say it is in fact a person standing at the side of the photographer drinking a bottle of water is a very plausible explanation I don't know BUT I can tell you that being in the field with the team and some of the highly strange events that took place while I was actually there are beyond explanation. Now please let me ask you this On my second trip in the field (2007) I was given the task of security should hikers or campers happen upon our site This one particular night we all heard the unmistakable sound of numerous Hummer…s coming up the mountain and then they stopped. My security partner and I were sent to check it out Dr. Greer gave me his KGB 2nd gen night vision goggles. We have been told to tell outside people that we are simply an Astronomy group watching the stars So there I was in the trees and bushes and as I scanned near where we heard the Hummer noise I happened to spot a Military person in full gear scanning the area(unless he was an actor and Dr. Greer coordinated this entire “Military” event) “Now that deserves the giggle factor“ IMHO. Anyway he didn't see me but I sure saw him and I could hear others making noise so I quickly made my way back to the group completely freaked out Now let me ask you (if you can believe my story and I have no reason to make this up I simply went on 2 expeditions and have not been with these people in 3 years) but if you are to believe me then ask yourself this “if there is nothing to this if CSETI…s team and Dr. Greer are nothing but crackpots” then why the heck would the military invest so much in keeping an eye on CSETI…s efforts? .......
Anyway I just want to leave ya…ll with the thought that not everything is as you might think it is.
Thanks for listening – Harold

Researchers have unveiled the second oldest skeleton of a possible human ancestor, a 3.6–million–year–old male of the species Australopithecus afarensis. The roughly 40% complete skeleton has been nicknamed Kadanuumuu, which means "big man" in the Afar language of the Afar Depression of Ethiopia where it was found. "It was huge-a big man, with long legs," says lead author Yohannes Haile–Selassie, a paleoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio.
The new skeleton is almost half a million years older than Lucy, the famous A. afarensis specimen discovered in 1974. It had long legs and a torso and a pelvis more like a modern human than an African ape, showing that fully upright walking was in place at this early date, Haile–Selassie says. Although headless, the skeleton also preserves parts not found before in Lucy's species. "It is important because it provides the ribs and scapula," or shoulder blade, says paleoanthropologist Carol Ward of the University of Missouri, Columbia.
In 2005, a sharp–eyed member of Haile–Selassie's team, Alemayehu Asfaw, spotted a fragment of a lower arm bone on the ground at Woranso–Mille, about 48 kilometers north of Lucy's grave at Hadar. Over the next 4 years, the team unearthed the shoulder blade, collarbone, ribs, and neck vertebra, the first time those bones were found together from one adult individual of A. afarensis. The team also found a pelvis, an arm, and leg bones.
When the bones were laid out, Haile–Selassie found that the robust male stood between 1.5 and 1.7 meters tall, about 30% larger than Lucy. The shoulder blade looks more like that of a gorilla and a modern human than that of a chimpanzee. The curvature of the second rib suggests a wide rib cage at the top and a barrel shape overall, similar to that of modern humans and distinct from the more funnel–shaped rib cage of a chimpanzee, the authors report online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Even more impressive were fossil deposits found by naturalist **Rex Gilroy around Bathurst. He excavated from a depth of 6 feet (2 m) below the surface a fossil lower back molar tooth measuring 67 mm. in length by 50mm. x 42 mm. across the crown. If his measurements are correct, the owner would have been at least 25 ft. tall, weighing well over 1,000 lbs!
** Rex Gilroy's site: Enormous Fossil Footprints Besides these tools and fossil teeth, enormous fossil footprints have been found from over a wide area of Australia, some measuring 2 ft in length and 8 inches to over a foot in width. Other prints measure 18 inches wide and as much as 30 inches in length. The implications are that men of 12 to 20 ft in height once roamed the continent. The ages of these fossil prints range from one to several million years. There were other prints which I made only a passing reference to in the article as they fell outside the above category.
Among these are a set of three huge footprints discovered a few years ago near Mulgoa south of Penrith NSW. These prints each measuring 2 ft in length and 7 inches across the toes are 6ft apart indicating the stride of the 12ft giant who left them. The prints are preserved in volcanic lava and ash flows which occured in the Triassic period! The excuse of some Palaeontologists that the five-toed prints were probably made by a reptile with a manlike foot does not hold water and amore convincing counter argument has yet to be offered for them.
Another set of fossil footprints which fit this category are to be found on the Blue Mountains west of Penrith. The two prints are 14 inches in length and 6 inches across the toes. They are impressed into a solid iron stone embankment. Gravels a few feet below them indicate that the prints were actually impressed into the mud on a river bank. The geological evidence indicates the volcanic lava covered the site shortly after, thus preserving the prints. It is not only the evidence of volcanic lava that attests to the great age of the footprints. The river gravels and fossilised footprints lie nearby the tracks of another much larger creature, the three-toed prints of some long dead reptillian giant of the Triassic period.